Learning Tools: for the Learner
Jane Hart thinks the following list is the ‘Top 10’ tools for learners (in no particular order):
I’m not so sure. If I was forced to lis them I’d be a little less specific, a little more descriptive:
- Internet Search Engine: I use Google a lot. But also like to use www.live.com as this can sometimes gives better results for non-commercial activity (blogs, news, information, etc).
- Video: I don’t usually go looking for video, but YouTube is a good starting point. The fact that, for eLearning purposes, YouTube now has the Education branch www.youtube.com/edu makes it better for students and professionals alike. We can’t ignore iTunesU as well, simply as there are so many major Universities producing their materials there.
- Internet Browser: I like IE7, I don’t like Mozilla 3, and I do like Google Chrome. There I said it, now I can sit back and wait for the backlash to begin!!
- Wikipedia: While there is so much information available through Wikipedia, so very little of it has been checked and verified. No, I can’t and don’t recommend this as a source for information, unless it comes with a very large ‘be warned’ sticker attached.
- Social Bookmarking: I’ve only just starting using Delicious, so can’t really say much on this yet, other than it’s confusing, yet handy when I work on several machines (work, home).
- Social Network: I’ve deleted myFacebook account, so don’t care about FB anymore, it’s had it’s day and is only surviving due to the pre-15 year olds that think it makes them look older to keep harping on about what they’re saying and doing on FB. I love Twitter (see below) and try not to use too many others or I’ll never get any work done.
- RSS: a valuable way to keep track of many important bloggers and information sources. Again, I’ve never really got the hang of it, but I do (try to) use FeedDemon on the bloggers I like to follow.
- Blogging: I use WordPress here, and I’d recommend anyone else to use it too .. but make sure you install it to your own server and host it yourselves – you are too restricted in templates and plugins on the hosted (free) version. There are other blog tools, but I think this is the best (I did try Blogger as well, but gave up in favour of WP).
- Skype: I love the simplicity of it, but hate the endless time wasted having to explain it to everyone who isn’t on it … and they are often the people I want to talk to. It’ll only be any good once everyone uses it.
As for Twitter … I feel a little silly saying this as I’ve only been using it for about 2 months, but I really can’t remember how I found anything f any use before I used it!
- I like the 140 character limit and the fact that it stops my rabbiting on about naff all, and it stops others doing the same.
- I use the ‘favourite’ option to tag tweets when I’m on the move with the iPod and see something I want to read in more detail (add it to favourite for later).
- I live for the endless new and different information and viewpoints that people that are 10,000 miles away, or only 1 mile away, have.
- I hate the fact that so much good tweeting happens during the night in the UK, and I have quite a bit to catch up the next morning.
- I will stop following anyone if they buy and get more than 140 characters. That is not the point of Twitter, now stop being stupid!
David, Can I add your list to the contributions received so far, or would you like to do so at http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=cFZnblZ4RHFyN0ZBa0w4V2tYenRuZkE6MA. Jane
Hi Jane. I don’t have a sign-in for Google yet, so please feel free to add my contribution (I’ll sort myself out one day, then I can do it myself). Thanks for the great articles I’ve been reading this past few months, don’t stop.
David.
Virtually every source of information should come with a warning label. Far too few people use critical thinking skills when they are evaluation information they consume in their daily lives (online, television, conversational, and printed).
You might be interested in the Nature article and research done a few years back. The research compared scientific entries in Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica – virtually the same. In fact, Wikipedia actually had less errors.
I’m not saying Wikipedia is a gold-standard for research. But as a starting off point to initially learn about novel content, I can’t think of a better place. Of course, you are welcome to disagree.