What is a Learning Technologist (part 5)?
Depending on where you work you might use the title Learning Technologist, Education Technologist, Instructional Designer, or something else, but essentially these roles are the same.
- See the ‘related posts’ section below for links to the previous 4 posts in this series.
Here are a few excerpts from job descriptions for these roles that I found with a quick Google search, see for yourself:
- “Provides pedagogic advice, guidance, encouragement and support on the use of technology to staff involved in teaching. Such processes involves mutual learning, and frequently contrast with the clear division of labour that characterises Instructional Design.”
Source: JISC – Recommendations for an accreditation scheme for learning technologists v. 4.6 (Consultation document 19/03/04) - “Promoting and the appropriate pedagogical use of e-learning through resources,
communication and assessment tools.”
Source: Bournemouth University – Job Description & Person Specification (PDF 55.70kb) - “Develop and institute logistical, instructional, and pedagogical policies for the creation and delivery of online courses.”
Source: UTD – Job Description
While reading this post last night – Learning Technology Trends To Watch In 2012 – I found the section on “Expanded Instructional Designer’s Role” quite interesting, not least as the expanded role sounded an awful lot like the work I am already engaged in?
“Captured in Clive Shepherd’s book, The New Learning Architect, the idea that an instructional designer has one only one function – course creation – seems outdated. Although many will continue to develop courses, instructional designers will need to think in broad terms about how to close learning gaps. This means understanding the strategies that underlie diverse possibilities for learning, both formal and informal, traditional and nontraditional, online and print and face-to-face and virtual.”
Many of the people I converse with on Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, Facebook, at work, at conferences, etc, are also of this opinion: that it is more than just the final result that the LT (Learning Technologist) is interested in, that the LT can be a vital part of the whole process in getting the learning materials researched, set up, assessed, etc. Convincing others of this is not always easy.
“For example, instructional designers are managing communities of practice, curating content, facilitating online discussion groups, organizing events and supporting of social media for learning. Instructional designers are often the proponents of innovation and the persuaders who convince upper management that interaction and collaboration will make for a smarter organization. As more instructional designers and educators see themselves as learning architects, the world will become a smarter place.”
Wow, this is me, am I now a Learning Architect?
Do you have a view or comment on this, or any other aspect of the role or industry you work in? If so then please leave a comment and open the discussion.
Great post on the expanded role. Agree with you that it is increasingly the case that those in the Ed Tech community are forming this consensus but it is tricky to communicate this to others steeped in the traditional course/elearning model.
Hi David – really fascinating series of
posts. I’ve always been slightly wary of the term instructional designer
mainly because of its behaviourist roots. However I kind of get where Clive is
coming from with his Learning Architect title.
When I was a proper Learning Technologist (many years ago now) I always
saw a key part of the role as being a bridge between people, technology and
common understandings.
Thanks Sheila. I too like the name but understand that it
varies from place to place. What is more important – terminology and naming
conventions across the industry sector, or the role and responsibilities? Again,
this is not equal across those who employ LTs, but this could be a good thing,
right?
All the best, David